CrunchWize / Legal & Business

Design Patent vs Non-Provisional Patent Application

Last updated July 2026

Design Patent

Protection for the ornamental appearance of a product

7/10
Pricing$2,000-$4,000 typical all-in through issuance

Advantages

  • Cheaper and faster than utility patents ($2,000-$4,000 all-in typical)
  • Filing to issuance typically 12-18 months
  • Federal protection against products with substantially similar appearance
  • 15-year term from grant, no maintenance fees
  • Great for consumer products with distinctive shapes or looks

Drawbacks

  • Only protects the ornamental appearance, not the function
  • 15-year term shorter than utility's 20 years
  • Easily designed around by making the product look different
  • Doesn't cover software or method inventions

Non-Provisional Patent Application

Formal patent application that gets examined by the USPTO

8/10
Pricing$5,000-$15,000+ all-in through issuance

Advantages

  • The actual patent application that can grant a 20-year monopoly
  • Formally examined by a USPTO patent examiner
  • Grants enforceable rights upon issuance
  • Can claim priority to an earlier provisional if filed within 12 months
  • Required for design patents

Drawbacks

  • USPTO filing fee $800-$3,000+ depending on entity size and claim count
  • Full attorney fees typically $5,000-$10,000+
  • Examination takes 2-4 years to first office action and possible allowance
  • Requires formal claims, specification, drawings

Design Patent and Non-Provisional Patent Application both play in intellectual property protection, but they're aimed at different buyers. Design Patent is built for consumer product companies with distinctive product shapes or appearances. Non-Provisional Patent Application is built for inventors ready to seek formal patent grant on a fully described invention. Which one fits depends on which of those descriptions sounds more like you.

Feature Comparison

FeatureDesign PatentNon-Provisional Patent Application
What It ProtectsOrnamental appearance (shape, surface pattern) of a productSame underlying invention, once granted, 20-year monopoly
How ObtainedUSPTO filing with drawings of the designUSPTO filing with formal claims, examination, and grant
Federal Filing Cost$220-$1,020 USPTO + $1,500-$3,000 attorney fees$800-$3,000+ USPTO + $2,000-$10,000+ attorney fees
Duration15 years from grant; no maintenance fees20 years from filing date (utility patent)
Symbol Rights'US D Patent No.' after grant'Patent Pending' during pending; 'US Patent No.' after grant
International ScopeHague Agreement or separate foreign filingsRequires PCT or separate filings for foreign protection
Typical Cost$2,000-$4,000 typical all-in$5,000-$15,000+ typical all-in through issuance
EnforcementFederal district court design patent infringement lawsuitFederal district court patent infringement lawsuit
Our Verdict

Non-Provisional Patent Application Wins

Non-Provisional Patent Application takes it overall (8/10 vs 7/10), but Design Patent is still the sharper pick for consumer product companies with distinctive product shapes or appearances.

Non-Provisional Patent Application's standout strength: The actual patent application that can grant a 20-year monopoly. Its biggest drawback (uSPTO filing fee $800-$3,000+ depending on entity size and claim count) is easier to live with than Design Patent's (only protects the ornamental appearance, not the function). Design Patent isn't out of the running though — its own standout strength is cheaper and faster than utility patents ($2,000-$4,000 all-in typical). If you fit the profile of consumer product companies with distinctive product shapes or appearances, that alone can flip the decision.

Design Patent is best forConsumer product companies with distinctive product shapes or appearances
Non-Provisional Patent Application is best forInventors ready to seek formal patent grant on a fully described invention